On 13/3/21 2:18 am, Ryan Long wrote:
> CID 1444140: Resource leak in rtems_rtl_shell_object().
>
> Closes #4300
> ---
> cpukit/libdl/rtl-shell.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/libdl/rtl-shell.c b/cpukit/libdl/rtl-shell.c
> index 9f8a136..bcecdd4 100644
> --- a/cpukit/libdl/rtl-shell.c
> +++ b/cpukit/libdl/rtl-shell.c
> @@ -733,14 +733,17 @@ rtems_rtl_shell_object (const rtems_printer* printer,
> int argc, char* argv[])
> if (dlinfo (RTLD_SELF, RTLD_DI_UNRESOLVED, &unresolved) < 0)
> {
> rtems_printf (printer, "error: %s: %s\n", argv[arg], dlerror ());
> + (void) dlclose (handle);
> return 1;
> }
>
> if (unresolved != 0)
> {
> rtems_printf (printer, "warning: unresolved symbols present\n");
> + (void) dlclose (handle);
> return 1;
> }
> + (void) dlclose (handle);
> }
> else if (strcmp (argv[arg], "unload") == 0)
> {
>
The handle should be not closed in any of these cases. Have you run the command
after making these changes and played with command?
This shell command is a tool to load and play with loaded modules and one
command is to load a module and others let you play with it. The handle address
is printed on the console. Coverity may like to track and nag you about things
like this but it is not always right.
In relation to all these Coverity changes ... are all these changes being
tested? Is the boarder context of the change being examined in relation to the
specific change?
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
