On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:01 AM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > > On 9/3/21 3:53 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 7:57 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> > >> On 9/3/21 1:44 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:14 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021, 4:02 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 6/3/21 2:24 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > >>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm getting the following error when trying to build rtems-libbsd from > >>>>>> RSB. Is there anything that I'm missing? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ``` > >>>>>> ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --prefix=$RTEMS6_PREFIX > >>>>>> 6/rtems-libbsd --host=powerpc-rtems6 --with-rtems-bsp=beatnik > >>>>>> RTEMS Source Builder - Set Builder, 6 (102cb1e6450f) > >>>>>> warning: exe: absolute exe found in path: (__chown) /usr/sbin/chown > >>>>>> Build Set: 6/rtems-libbsd > >>>>>> config: tools/rtems-libbsd-6.cfg > >>>>>> error: rtems-bsp.cfg:155: invalid %if operator: -mcpu=7400 > >>>>>> -I/home/vijay/development/rtems/6/powerpc-rtems6/beatnik/lib/include > >>>>> > >>>>> This looks like a bug. Please raise a ticket. > >>>>> > >>>>>> == > >>>>>> Build FAILED > >>>>>> Build Set: Time 0:00:00.046141 > >>>>>> Build FAILED > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ``` > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Commenting these checks from rtems-bsp.cfg gets it building. > >>>>> > >>>>> Unfortunately the checks are needed and this is not the answer. > >>>>> > >>>>> I wonder how Jennifer has been building libbsd. She is working on this > >>>>> BSP and > >>>>> libbsd. > >>>> > >>> > >>> This issue is happening with other bsps as well. > >> > >> Great and thanks for checking. I asked this question in the ticket. :) > >> > >>> This error is also being a blocker to building rtems-net-legacy with > >>> the new patch. I can have a look at it, do you have any hints on what > >>> might be going wrong? > >> > >> Yes in the ticket :) (in short for the thread run with --trace and compare > >> with > >> libbsd). > >> > > Hi, > > > > I think I found it! : > > I saw in the patch. A great find. It has been a long time since we have had a > logic problem in the config parser. This is excellent debugging work. > Thanks! I always wanted to be able to find a single character bug with a big impact. :D
Best regards, Vijay > Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
