On 2020-09-23 17:05, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:34 AM Daniel Hellstrom <dan...@gaisler.com> wrote:
Hi Sebastian,

Thanks for asking and sorry for dropping the ball on these.

The status is that two needs updating (BSD license for new CAN files and
the last tn0018 patch needs some redesign based on feedback) and the
others are accepted for master. I've sent an response on the tn0018
errata patch just now. I would like to push them on the 5 and master
branches. To get them onto 5, should  I create a ticket for the whole
patch set? I will try getting this done next next couple of days, and
have a look at you patches too, thanks!

It would be good to separate them logically to the TN-0018 errata
fixes vs the CAN/grlib improvements. The concern for pushing them to 5
is that they touch core sparc files, but since you guys are releasing
them this way in RCC I'm also comfortable with it. I didn't see any
changes outside the sparc (since currently grlib is sparc-specific
too). We'll need those tickets to help us with the dot-release notes.

Sorry for my very late response. There were some more updates on a few of the patches based on the review comments which has been addressed. I have now created tickets for all of them which are referenced from the patches, so I will go ahead and push them for the 5-branch (the posted patches targeted 5).

However, I will wait with the TN-0018 before I get an acknowledge for that one. I updated the its ticket with links to the GCC patch that has now been accepted into upstreams GCC (GCC-10 stable and master). The TN0018 patch is not enabled if the GCC-patch is not included in the toolchain, so I believe it should be ok to push, even before RSB is updated?

    https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4155

Next step for me is to add some configurations for the new build system before I can push them to RTEMS/master.

Thanks,
/Daniel



Kind Regards,
Daniel

On 2020-09-18 10:03, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hallo Daniel,

what are your plans with respect to this patch set?

Please also have a look at:

https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-September/062176.html

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to