-----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 02:44 To: Kinsey Moore <kinsey.mo...@oarcorp.com>; devel@rtems.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] score: Enforce stack and TLS alignment
> On 02/03/2021 23:35, Kinsey Moore wrote: >> I don't see that _Stack_Extend_size() does any overflow handling. Should it? >> Mathematical overflow is a possibility, but I'd expect to see problems >> attempting the allocation long before that since it's just pulling from the >> workspace area of the heap. > > Yes, I added this recently: > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=08cbd4ba201317d0f529cbdb48db9f4775804963 > > The problem is that if there is an overflow, then you may allocate a > small number. Ah, sorry. My local copy was stale by a day and I didn't see that patch come through. > Please have a look at this patch set: > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-March/065012.html Will do. Kinsey _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
