On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:14 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > sbrk() cannot be removed and we need to maintained and test it as a BSP level > interface. > > This is an nice design idea where the sbrk() pool of memory can be given out > to > the heap or workspace depending on the demands of the application. I can see > this being important to application frameworks like EPICS and so something we > should look to add to all architectures. >
Please raise a ticket, this can be a GSoC project idea I think? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
