On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:14 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:42 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some tests which seem to pass >> most of the time but fail intermittently. It appears to be based somewhat >> on host load but there may be other factors. >> >> > There does not appear to be a good test results state for these. Marking >> them expected pass or fail means they will get flagged incorrectly >> sometimes. >> >> > Are they expected to pass every time? > Normally yes. But there appears to be some external factors particularly load impacting qemu which lead to failures on target side code. > Intermittent failures are suspicious, and there is limited value to > running a test that has an "intermittent failure" state, since it will > always be successful if you don't care if it passes or fails. > Yeah. No matter what you mark them, it sucks. > > > >> I don't see not running them as a good option. Beyond adding a new state >> to reflect this oddity, any suggestions? >> >> --joel >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> devel@rtems.org >> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel