On 14/12/2020 07:31, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11/12/2020 17:43, Joel Sherrill wrote:
If renaming them introduces challenges, then we should explicitly
use -0 for the first requirement always, and not allow unnumbered
ones to exist.
+1
I would be concerned that the unnumbered ones would be following a
different naming pattern which would make the requirements file matching
pattern harder.
We should not make things more complicated than necessary. The goal is
to have descriptive names for the requirements. If a numbering makes
sense, then it should start with zero. If you need more than 10
numbers, then using 00 is also acceptable, for example:
/rtems/event/if/event-00.
It seems the *-0 scheme was already used by Frank to specify the basedefs:
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-central/tree/spec/rtems/basedefs/req
For example
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-central/tree/spec/rtems/basedefs/req/packed-0.yml
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-central/tree/spec/rtems/basedefs/req/packed-1.yml
https://git.rtems.org/rtems-central/tree/spec/rtems/basedefs/req/packed-2.yml
I would have probably used no numbers and instead something like
packed-member
packed-type
packed-enum
I don't care much which style we use in the end, but it should be
consistent across the specification. So, it is good to have this
discussion and it is evident what the current
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/req/req-for-req.html#reqengident
is incomplete.
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
