On 04/12/2020 08:56, Richi Dubey wrote:

When I am trying to debug tm24 running on the Strong APA scheduler 
code, I can see that the thread which comes after the call 
to _CPU_Context_switch, resumes execution from the same code (next 
line in the _Thread_Do_dispatch function after _CPU_Context_switch), 
whereas when the same code is run on a different scheduler (the 
default sp scheduler) the heir thread that executes after the call 
to _CPU_Context_switch starts executing from  _Thread_Handler and does 
not resume its execution from the _Thread_Do_dispatch (which has the 
context_switch function call).
Why is this happening? Is the scheduler responsible for this?
I have currently no time to help you debugging this issue.

Each thread starts the execution in _Thread_Handler(). A context switch returns to _Thread_Do_dispatch() or jumps to _Thread_Handler(). The _Thread_Handler() completes the context switch, does some general calls to begin the thread execution and then calls the thread entry function.
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08

Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to