On 19/11/2020 23:19, Gedare Bloom wrote:

But there is for example

_ARMV7M_NVIC_Is_enabled
_ARMV7M_NVIC_Set_enable
_ARMV7M_DWT_Enable_CYCCNT
ARMV7M_MPU_Access_permissions

and some others in the same file. So I would lean towards what Sebastian
suggested. Otherwise the new functions wouldn't fit the scheme of the
existing ones.

OK, I don't think those are proper, but consistency is good. You can
proceed with the MPU_Xxx

The idea was to have support for several hardware modules in this file. So, from the naming convention point of view _ARMV7M_NVIC and _ARMV7M_DWT are the modules and not simply _ARMV7M.

--
embedded brains GmbH
Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
Phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
Fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
PGP: Public key available on request.

embedded brains GmbH
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier: 
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to