On 17/11/2020 00:15, Chris Johns wrote:
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0f7db65a8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuites/validation/ts-default.h
@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause */
+
+/**
+ * @file
+ *
+ * @brief This header file provides the default validation test suite runner
+ * and application configuration.
+ */
[...]
+#define CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_EDF_SMP
+
+#include <rtems/scheduler.h>
+
+RTEMS_SCHEDULER_EDF_SMP(a);
+
+RTEMS_SCHEDULER_EDF_SMP(b);
+
+RTEMS_SCHEDULER_EDF_SMP(c);
+
+#define CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_TABLE_ENTRIES \
+ RTEMS_SCHEDULER_TABLE_EDF_SMP(a, rtems_build_name('A', ' ', ' ', ' ')), \
+ RTEMS_SCHEDULER_TABLE_EDF_SMP(b, rtems_build_name('B', ' ', ' ', ' ')), \
+ RTEMS_SCHEDULER_TABLE_EDF_SMP(c, rtems_build_name('C', ' ', ' ', ' '))
+
+#define CONFIGURE_SCHEDULER_ASSIGNMENTS \
+ RTEMS_SCHEDULER_ASSIGN(0, RTEMS_SCHEDULER_ASSIGN_PROCESSOR_MANDATORY), \
+ RTEMS_SCHEDULER_ASSIGN(1, RTEMS_SCHEDULER_ASSIGN_PROCESSOR_OPTIONAL), \
+ RTEMS_SCHEDULER_ASSIGN(2, RTEMS_SCHEDULER_ASSIGN_PROCESSOR_OPTIONAL), \
+ RTEMS_SCHEDULER_ASSIGN(2, RTEMS_SCHEDULER_ASSIGN_PROCESSOR_OPTIONAL)
+
These seems specific but I ma not sure.
This configuration provides enough resources to run a wide range of test cases.
For example, the SMP scheduler configuration with three schedulers can be used
to test most of the SMP support of RTEMS.
Do tests depend on this configuration?
Yes, if the configuration provides the necessary resources, they pass, otherwise
they fail.
Any particular reason for those schedulers in that order?
Most tests use one processor. With just two processors you can probably
test more than 90% of the RTEMS SMP support. Only some very specific
corner cases need more than two processors. This is a general purpose
test suite and the configuration will be adapted if a new test case
needs something special. If it is too special, then it can be added to a
dedicated test suite.
Does the number of cores available effect this or the dependent tests? I assume
this is included in a number of tests.
If a test needs three processors and a board has only two, then the test case
should fail.
Will those BSPs have the failing tests excluded?
Currently, there is no support for the new test framework in the RTEMS
Tester. You can only specify the expected state of a complete test
suite. I hope to eventually add some support for the new test framework
so that the expected state of individual test cases can be specified.
I would like to be comfortable the tests and these set ups are not solely
focused on the LEON.
I am not focused on the LEON. Why do you think something is
LEON-specific in this test suite?
--
embedded brains GmbH
Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
Phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
Fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
PGP: Public key available on request.
embedded brains GmbH
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
