all 4 look good to me.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:43 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > --- > eng/coding-conventions.rst | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eng/coding-conventions.rst b/eng/coding-conventions.rst > index 5dd8df5..e34cd74 100644 > --- a/eng/coding-conventions.rst > +++ b/eng/coding-conventions.rst > @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ > Coding Conventions > ****************** > > -The style of RTEMS is generally consistent in the core areas. > -This page attempts to capture generally accepted practices. > -When in doubt, consult the code around you or look in cpukit/rtems. > -See the sister page `Doxygen Recommendations > <https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coding/Doxygen>`_. > -for examples that illustrate style rules and Doxygen usage. > +The style of RTEMS is generally consistent in the core areas. This section > +attempts to capture generally accepted practices. When in doubt, consult the > +code around you, look in the RTEMS sources in the directories > +:file:`cpukit/include/rtems/score` and :file:`cpukit/score`, or ask on the > +:r:list:`devel`. > > Source Documentation > -------------------- > -- > 2.26.2 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
