On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 12:13 PM Christian Mauderer <o...@c-mauderer.de> wrote: > > Hello Niteesh, > > On 02/11/2020 18:06, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > ping. > > Yes, of course you are right that it would be time to integrate it. The > nasty part why I haven't started to do something into that direction is > that we currently still have the old build system and the new in > parallel. But I think we should start to integrate your code anyway. > > Please correct me if I'm wrong: Currently there are two parts: > > 1. Adding the OFW interface. > > 2. Using in in BBB. > > Is that correct? > > I think the first one should be not too hard. There are already some > parts that use only the new build system. Wouldn't be a problem to do > that with OFW too. So to all participating at the discussion: Is there > any blocker left why we wouldn't integrate an updated version of the > patches? >
I think this is fine. Of course, we get less confident about the comparison between the two build systems. But, without someone actively engaged in verifying them, I think at some point we need to just start to move on. I currently lack time, hopefully in Dec I can revisit. I have a t2080rdb I want to get set up and may be able to test both old/new build systems. It will be good to keep bsps building with the old build system until we kill it off. Especially the BBB (and other common test targets). So your analysis is spot on. Gedare _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
