On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:23 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 22/10/2020 02:40, Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > > Hello, this thread has gone a bit cold over the last few weeks, due to > > my engagement in the university tests. I have provided a debug trace > > for the issue. The reason for fatal exceptions is the fact that while > > iterating over the chain of user extensions we access a node whose > > memory location has been set to NO-ACCESS during the context switch. > > Is there any work-around to this? > > The option is to move the User_extensions_Iterator storage out of the > stack to Thread_Control and Per_CPU_Control. > > Does this mean that I should add User_extensions_Iterator field in the Thread_Control structure for the case when we enable thread stack protection? > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
