On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:20 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
> Thanks for this. Someone should at least add TBD stubs for a few > languages. If we say nothing, the assumption is there is nothing to > say. You can open a ticket, assign it to me if you like. It will take > some research to find the set of languages. > +1 Please add a TBD section for at least C and Ada along with a comment that points to a ticket for it. This will get lost otherwise. --joel > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 4:01 PM <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Thank you for the reviews and comments of the v1 patch. I believe I have > > addressed the items raised in the review comments. > > > > I have not added sections for languages I do not know about or use. I > think > > it is best those who know the language and support it should add a > section. > > I understand this patch maybe feel unbalanced but I would rather attempt > > a start at a section with what I know thana having to wait for me to > learn > > and research and test Ada and Fortran. > > > > Chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
