On 9/10/20 4:48 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > I think API descriptions should go into the RTEMS Classic API Guide.
Which bit or the whole thing? The patch is more about an example of threading in C++ and the standards addition I have added than more formal API documentation. I can add a more formal API section if we think there is a need but the thread class itself is documented in the standard already. I think we need a languages section. The scheduling bits can be (re)moved if needed. I could not find anything in the POSIX manual I could reference. > Maybe we should rename this manual. Do you have a name in mind? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
