On 6/10/20 5:12 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > thanks, looks good. Great :)
> I would have added the stuff to <rtems/thread.hpp> similar to > <boost/thread.hpp> That is a great idea. I did not like `c++` in the path but I also did not think `rtems/thread` was suitable. > but this is a matter of taste. I do not like .hpp as an extension but in this case with a mixed C and now C++ set of interfaces it makes sense. Again thanks Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
