On 05/10/2020 14:22, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:59 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
On 04/10/2020 06:18, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> diff --git a/bsps/arm/imx/start/bspstart.c
b/bsps/arm/imx/start/bspstart.c
> index 5fb07bf60a..ff4b204790 100644
> --- a/bsps/arm/imx/start/bspstart.c
> +++ b/bsps/arm/imx/start/bspstart.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <bsp/fdt.h>
> #include <bsp/irq-generic.h>
> #include <bsp/linker-symbols.h>
> +#include <dev/clock/arm-generic-timer.h>
>
> #include <libfdt.h>
>
> @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ uint32_t bsp_fdt_map_intr(const uint32_t
*intr, size_t icells)
> return intr[1] + MAGIC_IRQ_OFFSET;
> }
>
> -void arm_generic_timer_get_config(
> +void aarch_generic_timer_get_config(
Why did the function name change? The header file name starts also
with
arm and not aarch.
ARM uses the terms aarch32 and aarch64 so it does make sense to
refer bits and bobs as aarch.
I am not really fond of using aarch32 for existing stuff which already
had an arm prefix. I would use "arm" for shared stuff and the 32-bit
ARM. I would use "aarch64" for the 64-bit stuff.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
