On 02/10/2020 01:29, Chris Johns wrote:
On 2/10/20 2:32 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 10:53 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>>
wrote:
This one has calling sequence, parameters, description:
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/c-user-4.pdf
This is preferable. We should try to follow the POSIX ordering.
This looks OK.
It looks like the ordering of the methods has changed. It was generally
very carefully chosen. Why would close be the first service listed?
The order generally reflects the usage -- open before close, create
before delete. etc.
The order shouldn't change.
Yes I agree but I suspect the order will need to stored somewhere.
I can add a hand crafted order to the specification. I was just a bit
easier to sort alphabetically.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
