> > Deleting a suspended thread would not require any actions on the Ready set > of threads, for example.
This is exactly what I was wondering. I'll look into data structures as you suggested. Thanks. On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:57 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:54 AM Richi Dubey <richidu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for the advice. >> >> I feel something is going wrong when we're trying to delete a suspended >> task because maybe I'm not handling the suspension/deletion of tasks >> properly in my code. Do you think this might be true for my code >> <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/blob/Release-Strong-APA/cpukit/score/src/schedulerstrongapa.c> >> ? >> > > That's a specific scheduler action and combination of object states. It is > quite possible something is not processed correctly by your scheduler. > Deleting a suspended thread would not require any actions on the Ready set > of threads, for example. > > --joel > > > >> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:41 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >>> This isn't a proper solution but a debug technique. When stepping >>> and running result in different behavior, it is sometimes useful to >>> run to a specific point and look at data structures for anomalies. >>> >>> Since TA1 never prints, I wonder if something went wrong with the >>> data structures before INIT deletes itself at the bottom. >>> >>> --joel >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Richi Dubey <richidu...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've been trying to debug why sp02 keeps failing on Strong APA >>>> scheduler and it's hard for me to debug because there are different points >>>> at which the same program breaks on gdb even though this is a single >>>> processor test. I have attached the different error logs. In error.txt, we >>>> can see that the execution fails somewhere in _Context_Switch while it is >>>> not the case when I step inside in case II, and other random things like >>>> these keep happening. I'd appreciate it if you direct my thoughts. >>>> >>>> I'm testing the source over this >>>> <https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061661.html> and >>>> this >>>> <https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-September/061832.html> >>>> patch. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Richi. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> devel mailing list >>>> devel@rtems.org >>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >>>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
