On Tue, Sep 15, 2020, 10:35 PM Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> wrote: > On 15/9/20 6:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 14/09/2020 06:52, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > >>> > >>> They are created using the words from your sentence above :) > >>> > >>>> My favorite is still rtems_task_build(). > >>> > >>> Not mine. Do you create, build then start? I think it needs create and > it lacks > >>> the storage bit. > >> > >> Maybe we should use a synonym of "create" (build is not a synonym of > create) > >> such as "make": > >> > >> rtems_task_make() > >> > >> rtems_message_queue_make() > > > > With respect to the directive name, what about the "make" variant? I > think this > > avoids a potential create, build then start confusion. We have create > then > > start, or make then start. > > I think this idea. > > > Maybe another synonym of create like produce, fabricate, construct, > forge, ...? > > rtems_task_construct() ? >
I kind of like this but this may be because the FACE Life Cycle has construction, initialisation, configuration, finalization, and destruction. This really is a construction phase operation. > > You create a task including its resources and you construct a task from the > provided resources. > > Chris >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
