Start at the end and work your way back. The clean version reports: Passed: 636 Failed: 1 User Input: 6 Expected Fail: 1 Indeterminate: 0 Benchmark: 3 Timeout: 3 Invalid: 5 Wrong Version: 1 Wrong Build: 0 Wrong Tools: 0 ------------------ Total: 656
Your version reports: Passed: 600 Failed: 22 User Input: 6 Expected Fail: 1 Indeterminate: 0 Benchmark: 3 Timeout: 16 Invalid: 6 Wrong Version: 0 Wrong Build: 0 Wrong Tools: 0 ------------------ Total: 654 You'll want to poke at those failures first and triage them. Fixing one may cascade to other tests, so rerun the testsuite after you try a fix. On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:59 PM Richi Dubey <richidu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Please find attached the log of rtems-test with the "clean" version (Commit: > 61ccb9c05d (HEAD, tag: 5.1, origin/5) bsp/xilinx-zynq: Flush TX-Buffer before > initializing uar) vs my Strong APA changes (with name > log_leon3_sis_strong_apa). > > I haven't looked at the log in detail yet, but please let me know if there's > anything odd that sparks interest. > > Thanks, > Richi. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
