Hello Joel,
On 04/09/2020 05:17, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/9/20 10:08 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 03/09/2020 04:08, Chris Johns wrote:
On 3/9/20 2:09 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
In contrast to rtems_task_create() this function creates a task with a
user-provided task storage area. The new create function uses a
configuration structure instead of individual parameters.
Add RTEMS_TASK_STORAGE_ALIGNMENT to define the recommended alignment of
a task storage area.
Add RTEMS_TASK_STORAGE_SIZE() to calculate the recommended size of a
task storage area based on the task attributes and the size dedicated to
the task stack and thread-local storage. This macro may allow future
extensions without breaking the API.
Have all the issues in the other thread been resolved? It would be good to have
Joel ack this patch before it is merged.
I tried to address the issues raised by Joel.
He will need to answer.
sorry for being impatient, but I have a couple of patches which depend
on the availability of the new task create function. What do you think
about the directive name, the RTEMS_TASK_STORAGE_ALIGNMENT attribute,
and the RTEMS_TASK_STORAGE_SIZE() macro?
The documentation of this new directive is incomplete. I would like to
work first on the specification of the Classic API directives:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3993
This involves a unification/consolidation of the Doxgyen and Sphinx
documentation.
Afterwards I would like to concentrate more on higher level aspects
which cover more than one directive. During this work I will revisit the
documentation of rtems_task_create_from_config().
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
