On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 2:32 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > Remove the superfluous invalid name check since the object creation > directives ensure that objects with such a name cannot exist. Also
Should it instead be a (debug) assert? > finding an object with such a name would be no catastrophy if it really > exists. > --- > cpukit/score/src/objectnametoid.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/objectnametoid.c > b/cpukit/score/src/objectnametoid.c > index d89e161c8c..2a71c6e528 100644 > --- a/cpukit/score/src/objectnametoid.c > +++ b/cpukit/score/src/objectnametoid.c > @@ -40,9 +40,6 @@ Objects_Name_or_id_lookup_errors _Objects_Name_to_id_u32( > if ( !id ) > return OBJECTS_INVALID_ADDRESS; > > - if ( name == 0 ) > - return OBJECTS_INVALID_NAME; > - > maximum = _Objects_Get_maximum_index( information ); > search_local_node = false; > > -- > 2.26.2 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
