On 26/8/20 5:16 pm, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: users [mailto:users-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Chris Johns >> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 3:54 AM >> To: Users >> Subject: Announce: RTEMS 5.1 Release >> >> The RTEMS 5.1 Release is available. The release can be found at: > > Great news and thank you very much for your efforts. > I saw that there is no release tag for 5.1 in the repository. Is this > intentional or could you please add one?
Not intentional, just forgot to do this. Thank you for pointing it out. I am looking into it now. >> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/5/5.1 >> >> Please follow the release instructions provided by the link. >> >> The RTEMS 5 release is a significant milestone for the RTEMS project with >> many >> years of effort from many people as we continue to improve RTEMS's >> features, >> capabilities and performance while maintaining our stability. >> >> We love to hear about your projects and what you use RTEMS on so please >> let us >> know. You can post on u...@rtems.org or you can send Joel or me a private >> email. >> >> If you find a problem please raise a ticket and select the 5.2 milestone. The >> simplest way to create a ticket is to head to the developer Wiki at: >> > > Are there guidelines of changes which are allowed for 5.2? We allow bugs fixes but no new features unless ... > For example, we might need SPI on a Zynq board and could implement a driver > using the SPI-API. > Would this be acceptable as a patch for 5.2 since it shouldn't break any > features in the core-API? ... in a BSP if there is a general agreement and there is no regressions, ie the change adds and does not change what exists in the BSP. This hope is to have regular releases. >> >> ps: Happy birthday Dad! > > Happy Birthday :) > He is 92 and in lock down in Auckland. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
