Hi, My code is failing because its logic assumed (code here <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/blob/03650c47c537c1acd584c5a9c3db588ab49634ef/cpukit/score/src/schedulerstrongapa.c#L315>) that it would never get a node with an empty affinity (i.e. no affinity to any processor or a 0 affinity). This assumption proved wrong as I can see from the gdb and the current flow of code observed is:
------------------------------------------------ _Scheduler_strong_APA_Get_lowest_scheduled _Scheduler_SMP_Enqueue _Scheduler_strong_APA_Enqueue _Scheduler_SMP_Unblock _Scheduler_strong_APA_Unblock _Scheduler_Unblock _Thread_Clear_state_locked _Thread_Start rtems_task_start _RTEMS_tasks_Initialize_user_task rtems_initialize_executive boot_card bsp_start_hook_0_done ---------------------------------------------------- Why is this happening? The Affinity variable (defined here <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/blob/03650c47c537c1acd584c5a9c3db588ab49634ef/cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulerstrongapa.h#L75>) gets set whenever the Set affinity operation corresponding to Strong_APA scheduler (defined here <https://github.com/richidubey/rtems/blob/03650c47c537c1acd584c5a9c3db588ab49634ef/cpukit/score/src/schedulerstrongapa.c#L770>) gets called. So, why wasn't this function called before this happened? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Richi.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
