On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 3:41 AM Aschref Ben-Thabet <
aschref.ben-tha...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> From: Aschref Ben Thabet <aschref.ben-tha...@embedded-brains.de>
>
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/printer.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/printer.h
> b/cpukit/include/rtems/printer.h
> index dbd887221e..310937cc2f 100644
> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/printer.h
> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/printer.h
> @@ -130,7 +130,11 @@ static inline void rtems_printer_task_initialize(
> rtems_printer_task_context *context
> )
> {
> - memset( context, 0, sizeof( *context ) );
> + /*
> + * Some C++ compiler think that the structure is complex enough to need
> a
> + * proper constructor. Cast to void * to silence a warning.
> + */
> + memset( (void *) context, 0, sizeof( *context ) );
>
I understand the patch but does this mean all header files have to be C++XX
clean? Where XX is what version of C++.
I'm more concerned by the implications of the patch than the patch itself.
--joel
> }
>
> static inline void rtems_printer_task_set_stack_size(
> --
> 2.26.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel@rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
