On 10/8/20 6:48 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 10/08/2020 10:41, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 8/7/20 2:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 08/07/2020 03:11, Chris Johns wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/7/20 3:29 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>>>> The purpose of this import is unclear. >>>>> >>>>> This import caused the following error with Sphinx 3.0: >>>>> >>>>> Extension error: >>>>> Could not import extension rtemsdomain (exception: cannot import name >>>>> 'l_') >>>>> --- >>>>> common/rtemsdomain.py | 1 - >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/common/rtemsdomain.py b/common/rtemsdomain.py >>>>> index 49d0728..9b092a3 100644 >>>>> --- a/common/rtemsdomain.py >>>>> +++ b/common/rtemsdomain.py >>>>> @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ from docutils.parsers.rst import directives >>>>> from sphinx import addnodes >>>>> from sphinx.roles import XRefRole >>>>> -from sphinx.locale import l_, _ >>>> Is this backwards compatible? >>> It seems to work also with Sphinx 2.4. I didn't find uses of "l_" and "_" >>> in the >>> file. >> Please push. > It is already pushed to the master. Do you want it also on another branch?
Yes I think it should be given the need for Python3 and the latest Sphinx for maths rendering. Thanks Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
