> > It was difficult to find this mail. Descriptive subjects would be helpful.
Thank you for your efforts. I understand. Here are important scheduler-specific macros: > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/include/rtems/scheduler.h#n131 Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks. On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:32 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 13/07/2020 13:27, Richi Dubey wrote: > > > We use a zero-length array > > < > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/include/rtems/score/scheduleredfsmp.h#n105> > in > > > the definition of Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Context, but I can not see any > > code in scheduleredfsmp.c > > (https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/score/src/scheduleredfsmp.c) > > which actually increases the size of the array. All I can see is code > > that access/manipulate the array elements, but I do not see any code > > which does malloc/adds Scheduler_EDF_SMP_Ready_queue elements to the > > array. > > It was difficult to find this mail. Descriptive subjects would be helpful. > > This is a good question and I think we really have to improve our > internal documentation. In Doxygen there is no good link from internal > objects to their definition through application configuration options. > Having the application configuration options in Doxygen would be > definitely help here: > > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-July/060496.html > > The scheduler contexts and controls are generated by the confdefs.h > related header files. Please have a look at: > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/include/rtems/confdefs/scheduler.h > > Here are important scheduler-specific macros: > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/include/rtems/scheduler.h#n131 > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
