On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:55 PM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > Hello Gedare, > > what kind of performance benchmarking do you have in mind? >
The immediate goal is going to be performance comparison of RTEMS in baremetal vs hosted in a paravirtual environment. I haven't planned out the experiment yet, but probably some microbenchmarks of common operations, and maybe some application benchmarks if some make sense. > To benchmark the clustered scheduling, you need at least a system with > separated L2 caches, e.g. T4240 and LS1088A. > Thanks, that is not an immediate requirement for me, but good to know. > We don't have BSPs for the QorIQ Layerscape platform. The chips are > quite complex. > Also good to know. > I haven't looked closely at the Xilinx Zynq but it seems they only have > up to four cores and one L2 cache. We have a BSP for the Xilinx Zynq > UltraScale+ (I neveer tested it). So maybe select one of them with 4 > core and the T2080. > Yeah, that was my initial thought as well after a brief discussion with Joel. It would also be a good opportunity to put the UltraScale+ BSP to work. Thanks for the thoughtful feedback, it has helped narrow the choices down to two. Gedare _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
