On 18/07/2020 17:17, Eshan Dhawan wrote:
On 18-Jul-2020, at 4:52 PM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
Hello Eshan,
you produce a lot of extra work for me. Your patch applies now. But it didn't
build:
make[9]: *** No rule to make target 'fenv-vfp.c', needed by 'lib_a-fenv-vfp.o'.
Stop.
make[9]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[9]: Leaving directory
'/build/git-build/b-gcc-10.1.0-arm-rtems5/arm-rtems5/thumb/newlib/libm/machine/arm'
Fenv-vpf.c file was deleted as well as the declarations were deleted from
makefile.am
So it shouldn’t be compiled
Did you try Remaking the autoconf files after applying the patch ???
This patch have the autoconf files
I don't want to run autoconf myself to test your patches. Please include
the build system changes in your patches.
Why is x86_64 mentioned in the commit message? On the mailing list it was
discussed to use RISC-V as the model. Please improve the commit message in
general. It should reflect all the problems discussed on the mailing list and
how the commit addresses the issues.
The files follow the similar file structure as x86_64. So I added X86
Which file did you use as a template?
Attached is a patch which fixes a couple of obvious things. Please apply it,
review it, test it, and make a v4 patch out of it with an improved commit
message.
The error isn’t supposed to occur
I tested the code on machine
<0001-arm-fenv.c-Fix-use-of-defines-and-format.patch>
I will apply the patch and test it
And resend it
Is this patch applied over the current patch
Or the newlib master?
Over your v3 patch.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
