I'm willing, but time is limited for me. Feel free to assign a ticket to me. I'm not sure it should be a blocker per se, but it is certainly important
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:53 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > > Hi > > I know we are all struggling to get a release out but I just noticed that the > discussion of licensing for code/docs in RTEMS is a bit of a mess right now. > I am close to filing this as a blocker ticket due to its importance. > > SW Engineering Guide sections 6.3.1.2 (Licenses) and 11 (Licensing > Requirements) are somewhat overlapping and duplicative. In addition, Gedare's > old blog > http://gedare-csphd.blogspot.com/2013/05/software-licenses-with-rtems.html is > still a decent discussion of the underlying issues and goals even though we > have moved to BSD-2 and Creative Commons for documentation since he wrote > that in 2013. > > I **THINK** a good solution would be to reference the Chapter 11 Licensing > Requirements from the Coding Conventions chapter. And incorporate an updated > version of Gedare's blog text. > > I still don't think that either shows folks what to actually put in their > code. > > Hint: Gedare... I think you would be in the best position to merge the 2 > sections with an updated version of your blog. :) > > Comments? > > --joel > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
