On 17/04/2020 19:30, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:11 AM Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
Close #3953.
---
c-user/user_extensions.rst | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/c-user/user_extensions.rst b/c-user/user_extensions.rst
index c3bd1c6..89b86fd 100644
--- a/c-user/user_extensions.rst
+++ b/c-user/user_extensions.rst
@@ -466,6 +466,8 @@ DIRECTIVE STATUS CODES:
* - ``RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL``
- extension set created successfully
+ * - ``RTEMS_INVALID_ADDRESS``
+ - ``table`` or ``id`` are NULL
This is OK, I guess there are no other valid checks that are made on
addresses usually.
As we continue to improve our processes, it may be worth considering
the use of well-defined regions and symbol ranges to provide
additional sanity checks on address pointers, maybe. I'm just
ruminating.
Actually I think that all these NULL pointer checks are completely
superfluous. However, since most RTEMS APIs have them I thought it would
be consistent to add this also here.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
