On 14/4/20 5:12 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 14/04/2020 09:02, Chris Johns wrote:
On 14/4/20 4:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Close #3944.
---
rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg b/rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg
index d50615e..91296b1 100644
--- a/rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg
+++ b/rtems/config/rtems-bsp.cfg
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
# The linker flags need to include the machine options for the BSP.
#
%define mflags_filter awk '{for (i=1;i<NF;++i) if ($i ~ /\-m/)
printf("%s ",$i);}'
-%define rtems_bsp_ldflags %{rtems_bsp_ldflags} $(echo
"%{rtems_bsp_cflags}" | %{mflags_filter})
+%define rtems_bsp_ldflags %{rtems_bsp_ldflags} $(echo
"%{rtems_bsp_cflags}" | %{mflags_filter}) -Wl,--gc-sections
What about adding a define like ..
%define rtems_bsp_ldflags_extra -Wl,--gc-sections
.. or something like that and then adding it to rtems_bsp_ldflags?
It would make it easier to track.
Could you please change the patch and push it.
Sure, I will do this tomorrow.
In RTEMS 6, we should replace this flag tinkering.
We need to only expose the machine flags from RTEMS by default and an
extra flags are special pkgcfg flags.
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
