On 2020-04-06 22:06, Christian Mauderer wrote:
I checked it: Chris pulled that one in together with the reverted commit
from Sebastian today at about 7:00 UTC. So both patches are included in
current RSB master.

Sorry for missing that step. It's something normally not really
necessary during normal development (except if we really want to have a
commit for every RTEMS commit) and I'm still not aware of a lot of stuff
that is touched by the release.

I think the rules to guide us are ...

If anyone pushes a patch to rtems.git or rtems-libbsd.git branch 5-freebsd-12 the corresponding RSB configs need to be updated. If you think the patch does not warrant an update of these configurations then please do not push the patch and please consider not posting the patches for review. This helps Joel, Gedare and I figure out where we stand in getting the release stable so a branch can be made.

There is a small window of difference between the git builds from the RSB and a release. The RSB git builds use the hash in the config file while a release uses the sources held in the release URL and the release scripts that create the release source packages for rtems.git and rtems-libbsd.git use the branch's HEAD. This is the key reason we currently need to keep the RSB configs at the HEAD.

Once we branch these restrictions can be relaxed so the sooner this happens the sooner the restrictions can be relaxed.

Thanks
Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to