On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:17 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hello everyone, > As @Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhav.varo...@gmail.com> told the FreeBSD and > NetBSD implemenattio of ftw.h requirs fts.h which inturn requires > sys/mount.h which requirs many other headres that are not yet implemented > so creating a dependencies chain > requiring to add 10-15 more headers just to add ftw.h > So I started searching alternative sources to add ftw.h . So i found musl > also has a implementation for ftw.h as well and it dosent require fts.h to > be implemented > > I would request you all to look into it and see it the implementation is > useful for RTEMS > since they have used a different approach to the functions > > ftw.h : https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/include/ftw.h > ftw.c: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/legacy/ftw.c > nftw.c: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/misc/nftw.c > This looks like a better implementation option. At first glance, it has way fewer dependencies but does require pthread.h around line 122. newlib may need an feature flag (sys/features.h) added to know if the target supports pthreads. This looks WAY WAY more appropriate for newlib. Good find! --joel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
