On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, 8:21 PM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:22 PM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > confstr() from unistd.h also shows not supported in the compliance > status but it has some kind of supported in newlib(libc/sys/linux) > > sys/linux doesn't work on rtems. that is only for linux-specific newlib > builds >
We would need our own implementation. That's likely an example where the header with prototype is in newlib and the implementation is in RTEMS. > > > it also needs to be updated in the compliance status I think > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:37 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-March/058569.html > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:35 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:27 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, 1:55 PM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> It's present there. > >>>>> I hadn't checked there. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Does that mean the spreadsheet I uploaded yesterday needs updating > again? > >>> > >>> yes , the spreadsheet shows not supported. > >>> also, I have sent another mail related to this > >>> for wordexp.h > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Is there a ticket to close? > >>> > >>> No the ticket was closed earlier > >>> I missed that > >>>> > >>>> Finding something got added without the tracking update is a good > outcome > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:19 AM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, 1:37 PM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have identifies 2 main sources to port sockatmark(). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> NetBSD source: > >>>>>>> https://github.com/NetBSD/src/blob/trunk/lib/libc/net/sockatmark.c > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> FreeBSD Source : > >>>>>>> > https://github.com/lattera/freebsd/blob/master/lib/libc/net/sockatmark.c > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> musl has a same implementation as in FreeBSD > >>>>>>> which one would be better to follow. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This has to be in sync with rtems-libbsd and may already be there. > Please check if it is there. Just closing a ticket and updating the > spreadsheet is q food result. :) > >>>>>>> > > Should it also be available in "legacy" networking stack? Or do we let > that bitrot / maintain only? > Minimal changes. No additions. Certainly not this I think. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> thanks > >>>>>>> -Eshan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list > > devel@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
