On 16/3/20 11:02 am, Amar Takhar wrote: > On 2020-03-16 09:30 +1100, Chris Johns wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This looks good. Thank you for making the switch to pytest. >> >> Are you planning on moving all the exist "chris hacked" tests to pytest? > > I don't know probably not I don't have the time this was to get someone > started.
That is understandable. Are the patches available in your personal repo? >> If so I am wondering how you will stage the change? This size patch is >> perfect >> but I am concerned we may have some done and others not when the release >> branch >> is made if we push them in pieces? > > I don't see that as a problem personally this is why I added the message. I am fine with pieces being pushed after RTEMS 5 has branched. My concern is only related to the pending release. It is only a couple of weeks away if that. > The pytests are more comprehensive even if they don't all get converted going > forward we should be using pytest and anyone wishing to contribute can > convert > them. I agree and starting this happening is a great contribution. Thank you. > I've done 4 examples that should cover all our use cases for the rest of the > code. Converting the rest is pretty easy and I'm available to help anyone > who > has difficulty. Yes and again thank you. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
