On 11/03/2020 16:50, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Proclaimed may not be the English word you mean. What do you think you
are saying?
We built a spreadsheet analyzing all contributions to the
documentation based on source code logs. The original core
documentation was entirely written by OAR. Soit was no surprise that
at that point most of the documentation had still been written by OAR.
Only a handful of other side ever submitted any documentation
additions. That was primarily Gedare, Chris and Sebastian. We added
those copyright notices to reflect the submissions we identified. The
copyright notices in the texinfo files may not have been updated
properly but OAR never asserted ownership of those submissions. We all
were just sloppy.
The addition of these notices reflected what we decided then. I don't
see taking these out.
That's compounded by a poor choice of English which makes it sound
malicious on OAR's part
Sorry for the wording. It was not my intention to put OAR into a
malicious framing. I am not sure how we deal with attributions of
contributions before 2016.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
