Hi ,
I have updated https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2020 page.
Were there any documentation issues that need resolving for this?
> sis has recently been split out of gdb and there are multiple places
> that used sis as the example. It is hard to find them all.
>
Indeed I have found some pages that mention the use of standalone 'sis'
command, but I think they all work (never tested them).
I don't know why I couldn't get to run the simulator within the 'gdb'
command. Is this command deprecated?
Thank you.
Denil Verghese
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:58 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:20 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Denil,
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:07 AM Denil Verghese <denil...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > Myself Denil C Verghese, doing a degree in Bachelors of
>> Technology. I'm here because of two reasons. Foremost, I would like to be
>> part of this endeavor. Second, I want to be an intern as a part of GSoC.
>> >
>> Welcome.
>>
>> >
>> > I have done the hello world program mentioned at the wiki page and I
>> have attached the patch file with this mail. I not sure whether it is the
>> correct output or not. For some reason, I can't load the simulator by
>> executing 'tar sim' in gdb. Hence I used sis command with -gdb argument and
>> used 'tar remote:1234' to run the simulator. Is this enough?
>> >
>> Yes, this is good. Thank you. I received your screenshot proof.
>>
>>
> Add yourself to https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2020
>
>
>> >
>> > Thanks to Jiri Gaisler for helping me out with the hello World program.
>> >
>>
>>
> Were there any documentation issues that need resolving for this?
> sis has recently been split out of gdb and there are multiple places
> that used sis as the example. It is hard to find them all.
>
>
>> >
>> > I would like to work on RTEMS Release Notes Generator or Improve the
>> SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support. It would be great
>> if someone could guide me in selecting the project.
>> >
>> Great. Those are two quite distinct projects. The "Improve the SMP
>> Scheduler" will require strong C programming skills. The "Release
>> Notes Generator" would involve Python programming. Depending on which
>> language you are stronger in, you might choose to pursue one of them.
>>
>> >
>>
>
> Sebastian should comment on the SMP Scheduler Improvements. I
> have no idea what he has in mind.
>
> The Release Notes Generator was started a couple of years ago.
> Chris Johns knows what's left to make it production worthy.
>
> Start threads on each topic to attract the right mentors attention. :)
>
>
>> > I'm ready to resolve any mistakes that I may make. Hoping that I would
>> get some guidance on how to be a part of this.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thank You,
>> >
>> > Denil C Verghese
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@rtems.org
>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
