I don't know. There are checks for other things in the function when it
return other than successful.
Since it was never going to return "RTEMS_UNSATISFIED" as the "if" would
always evaluate to true I removed the unnecessary comparison
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:52 AM Peter Dufault <dufa...@hda.com> wrote:
> And regardless of the value of count it is successful?
>
> > On Feb 28, 2020, at 12:17 , suyash singh <suyashsingh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > count is unsigned int and will always be >=0.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:42 PM suyash singh <suyashsingh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > ---
> > bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c | 6 ++----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c
> b/bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c
> > index 57ef70126b..4041423541 100644
> > --- a/bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c
> > +++ b/bsps/shared/grlib/1553/b1553brm.c
> > @@ -982,10 +982,8 @@ static rtems_device_driver
> brm_write(rtems_device_major_number major, rtems_devi
> >
> > rw_args->bytes_moved = count;
> >
> > - if (count >= 0) {
> > - return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> > - }
> > - return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
> > + return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
> > +
> > }
> >
> > static rtems_device_driver brm_control(rtems_device_major_number major,
> rtems_device_minor_number minor, void *arg)
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel@rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> Peter
> -----------------
> Peter Dufault
> HD Associates, Inc. Software and System Engineering
>
> This email is delivered through the public internet using protocols
> subject to interception and tampering.
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
