I'm not opposed to this. I noticed a local uncommitted patch I posted a while back to bump dtc in rtems-tools. What about that as well?
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, 12:52 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > --- > cpukit/dtc/VERSION | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/cpukit/dtc/VERSION b/cpukit/dtc/VERSION > index fa27eb5c8e..a6f7720958 100644 > --- a/cpukit/dtc/VERSION > +++ b/cpukit/dtc/VERSION > @@ -4,15 +4,15 @@ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dtc/dtc.git > > Commit: > > -c12b2b0c20eb8fbe1a22065f1d5f0f155ab56b0a > +0f61c72dedc4bf11cd19a78fc36a7bde99d653e0 > > Date: > > -Thu Jul 19 08:19:43 2018 +0200 > +Thu Feb 20 14:45:57 2020 -0700 > > Commands to generate update patches: > > -git format-patch c12b2b0c20eb8fbe1a22065f1d5f0f155ab56b0a -- > libfdt/fdt_addresses.c libfdt/fdt.c libfdt/fdt_empty_tree.c libfdt/fdt.h > libfdt/fdt_ro.c libfdt/fdt_rw.c libfdt/fdt_strerror.c libfdt/fdt_sw.c > libfdt/fdt_wip.c libfdt/libfdt_env.h libfdt/libfdt.h > libfdt/libfdt_internal.h libfdt/TODO > +git format-patch 0f61c72dedc4bf11cd19a78fc36a7bde99d653e0 -- > libfdt/fdt_addresses.c libfdt/fdt.c libfdt/fdt_empty_tree.c libfdt/fdt.h > libfdt/fdt_ro.c libfdt/fdt_rw.c libfdt/fdt_strerror.c libfdt/fdt_sw.c > libfdt/fdt_wip.c libfdt/libfdt_env.h libfdt/libfdt.h > libfdt/libfdt_internal.h libfdt/TODO > sed -i 's%/libfdt/fdt.h%/cpukit/include/fdt.h%g' 00* > sed -i 's%/libfdt/libfdt.h%/cpukit/include/libfdt.h%g' 00* > sed -i 's%/libfdt/libfdt_env.h%/cpukit/include/libfdt_env.h%g' 00* > -- > 2.16.4 > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
