On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:06 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> so the subtasks would consist of adding missing functions to stat.h , > types.h mainly I suppose > What do you think is missing in those? My reading of the POSIX standard has is implying that <ftw.h> includes <sys/stat.h> to get st_mode and the stat structure. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/ftw.h.html The subtasks I referred to as the same for every time a new C Library or POSIX method is added to RTEMS or Newlib: + the code itself + test code + addition to documentation as needed + update to compliance tracking spreadsheet (usually I will do this) > > - Eshan > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 7:30 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 7:03 AM Eshan Dhawan <eshandhawa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I wanted to know the status of implementation of ftw.h in newlib >>> and the dependencies it requires? >>> >> >> FIrst hint is that the ticket is still open. :) >> >> The next is a way to check if it is part of the installed C Library. >> Wherever >> you installed the tools (TOOLS_PREFIX) for CPU-rtems5 >> >> find TOOLS_PREFIX -name ftw.h >> CPU-rtems5-nm TOOLS_PREFIX/CPU-rtems5/lib/libc.a | grep ftw >> >> In this case, you will see it isn't there. >> >> >>> >>> As it could be ported from FreeBSD since it lies under favourable >>> licence >>> >> >> Yep. And this would almost certainly need to be merged into the newlib C >> library >> with tests added to RTEMS. >> >> Documentation added to the POSIX Users Guide and the tracking spreadsheet >> updated. >> >> Just to list all the subtasks. :) >> >> --joel >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devel mailing list >>> devel@rtems.org >>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
