On 21/2/20 11:11 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 21/02/2020 12:26, Hesham Almatary wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 11:07, Sebastian Huber >> <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >>> Hello Hesham, >>> >>> On 20/02/2020 16:40, Hesham Almatary wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Are there any progress updates to the Waf build system integration in >>>> RTEMS? >>>> >>>> I have pulled [1] and it seems like it hasn't got many updates since >>>> December. I wonder what's still remaining/blocking to merge it, or at >>>> least push it as a development branch (without re-writing history) >>>> that others, including me, can use it and submit patches against. >>>> >>>> [1] git://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git >>> technically, the new build system is ready for integration into the >>> master branch. I would need about one day to rebase and test it before >>> the push. The integration is currently blocked since Chris and Joel had >>> no time to look at it. >>> >> Thanks for your input, Sebastian. Is there a recommended branch I >> should be based on? I noticed there's "build" and "build-next". > > The "build" branch contains the state of the first review. I updated > "build-next" a couple of times to integrate the changes on the RTEMS master. > >> Do you intend to re-write git history in either? > > Yes, when I started with the build system work I didn't expect a more than two > months review period.
I have discussed this merge with Joel. We have decided to release RTEMS 5 before we merge a new build system. A release with parallel build systems is confusing and distracting. I think we are close to a release if master can stay stable. The milestone ticket page ... https://devel.rtems.org/milestone/5.1 ... shows 43 in progress and 2 closed. Help with the tickets will help progress things. I am working on moving the libbsd release to the 5-freebsd-12 branch and the side effects that causes. I will need reports of a libbsd release snapshort running on ... beagleboneblack, imx7, xilinx_zynq_zedboard, qoriq_e500 I can do this for the beagleboneblack and xilinx_zynq_zedboard. Finally there is the FDT file managements, I would like a resolution on a suitable path to get FDT files into a release and at least one BSP to support this. I have selected the BeagleBone Black because I have one to test on. Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
