On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, 1:16 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Pragnesh, > > thanks for your contribution. I checked in the patch without the > frdme310arty.dts file. It had no license information and I think it is > not needed by the BSP directly. I guess a boot loader will provide the > device tree? But the bsp is not functional without it so can't be tested. How does this file get used on the real board? If the license question is answered, we need a long term solution as to its location. We shouldn't send users on a chase for a file which could disappear because we don't have it. Also can this run on a simulator with this or a similar device tree? It would be nice to have a bit of documentation for this > BSP variant here: > > https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/bsps/bsps-riscv.html#riscv > > https://git.rtems.org/rtems-docs/tree/user/bsps/bsps-riscv.rst > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
