On 24/10/19 4:03 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 24/10/2019 07:00, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 23/10/19 5:18 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 22/10/2019 14:45, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>>> I would like to see most targets moved to newer major versions but I think >>>> at >>>> least the PowerPC will want to bump for the upcoming gcc 7 release. >>> >>> Yes. For all targets except powerpc I would directly move to GCC 10. >> >> I am not sure about a change without some evidence there are no issues. >> Building >> on all supported hosts would be a good start, test results on hardware even >> better. > > If we are close to the RTEMS 5 release, then I would not change the GCC > baseline.
I would like to start the process to converge on a release. I am attempting to make space between now and the end of the year. The final point may depend on the work you are doing and it's schedule. >>>> Binutils has a new release and I think we also have changes to newlib to >>>> pick up. >>> >>> Some problems on ARM were mentioned on the Binutils mailing list. I am not >>> sure >>> what the status is here. >> >> Can binutils be upgraded? > > It seems the ARM issue turned out to be not a Binutils problem. So yes, we can > upgrade. Great. >>>> For newlib, I'm caught up at the moment. Not sure about Sebastian. >>> >>> I wait since one month for a Newlib patch approval. >> >> Is this important to 5? > > Yes, it is quite important if we want to keep the libbsd up to date. Is it just not review and so would a ping help? Chris _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
