On 02/09/2019 09:00, Chris Johns wrote:
Why not generate the call to `rtems_record_produce_2`? You should be able to determine this give you will know there in a single item plus the return address to record. In fact there is little need for `rtems_record_produce_n` if you have [1..n] already defined.
The rtems_record_produce_2() is just an optimization since most architectures accept up to four arguments via registers. The particular rtems_record_produce*() function is not the issue here.
-- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
