On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:17 AM Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > do you think an UUID > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier) is useful > to have for all requirements (and other specification items)? The > proposal for identifiers already ensures that all identifiers have a > proper namespace (e.g. RTEMS), so there is no strong need to have also > an UUID. It could be useful if you import the RTEMS requirements into > another system. Support for this would need a patch for Doorstop. > > https://github.com/jacebrowning/doorstop/issues/344 > > I am not sure if it is worth to do this. > I think it is better to have the human-readable unique IDs. It makes references to requirements easier to understand in context. Since we want those to be unique, and we have central control over generating them, there's no need for the UUID mechanism.
> -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
