On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:49 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:15 AM Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:23 PM Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:44 AM Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupt...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:25 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:43 AM Vaibhav Gupta < >>>>> vaibhavgupt...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hello, >>>>> > Progress so far: >>>>> > - NDBM patch is pushed by newlib. >>>>> > - NDBM Testsuite is sent to devel ([PATCH V6] ndbm test suite), its >>>>> execution will be verified once newlib has required files. Although I have >>>>> tested it by manually generating required file using 'autoreconf -fvi' on >>>>> my local system. >>>>> > >>>>> > Blocker: >>>>> > - My pace got slow last week as my college started, I informed about >>>>> it on devel. >>>>> > >>>>> > Next: >>>>> > - Implement fenv for SPARC first, then move on to ARM, PPC and >>>>> others. >>>>> > >>>>> What about fenv testcase? >>>>> >>>> I guess after Joel had a discussion in newlib, we will be switching code >>>> structure for fenv, so implementation of riscv will also need to be >>>> updated. >>>> . >>>> Hence, I will implement fenv for SPARC and make test case for same. >>>> >>> >>> The test case can be added now if you have a RISC-V toolchain. I expect >>> the test code will >>> have to be conditionalized on whether the target architecture supports >>> the fenv.h methods. >>> >> Okay then I will start working on testsuite, I will build riscv >> toolchain. >> >>> This would be best implemented with like AC_CHECK_FUNC and pick a >>> method like >>> fegetround() to probe for. >>> >> You mentioned that you have pushed NDBM testsuite in a conditional way on >> your branch, >> that will make testsuite compile only if ndbm tools are present. Can I >> get that code? >> It will be helpful for me. >> > > Sorry. I posted to devel@ but forgot to push. I just pushed it. > No problem, Thanks :)! > > --joel > > >> - Vaibhav Gupta >> >>> That way as you add support for other architectures, the test(s) >>> will automatically get enabled. >>> >>> The alternative is like how libdebugger tests have to list specific >>> architectures that are >>> supported. That requires manual intervention (but is the only option for >>> libdebugger). >>> >>>> >>>> -Vaibhav Gupta >>>> >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > Thank You >>>>> > Vaibhav Gupta >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > devel mailing list >>>>> > devel@rtems.org >>>>> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> devel mailing list >>>> devel@rtems.org >>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >>> >>>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
