On 29/07/2019 08:24, Chris Johns wrote:
On 29/7/19 4:16 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 29/07/2019 08:12, Chris Johns wrote:
On 29/7/19 4:08 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 29/07/2019 08:04, Chris Johns wrote:
The new one is probably:
0x00200080
I am not sure about the 0x80 tail, it should be the same as it was previously.
Better but interrupts?
The address 0x00200000 works with hello but ticker prints the "TEST VERSION"
banner and then nothing more.
Then the vector table needs to be probably at 0x0. Not really a great position
if you have a NULL pointer access.
Agreed.
Can you set the vector base on this ARM? If you can is that missing from this
BSP?
You can try this (v2 of the patch moves the vector base to 0, but it would be
better to have a NULL pointer protection):
This works (and v2 also works).
Ok, you can decide. Do you want a better NULL pointer protection at the
expense of some memory and an mkimage change?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
