Hi I just wanted to make sure we followed proper procedures and policies when considering rule checkers.
1. The license must appropriate. 2. There should be some basic requirements that the tool is expected to meet to be fit for purpose 3. The tool must support the range of development hosts used in the Community. As a detail, once selected the tool needs to have an RSB recipe. For style checkers, I am concerned that they are not integrated into the normal development and build process. There is already enough "garbage collection" to do and making a special pass. If that's the case, it will just be a burden. Just some thoughts. I'm not opposed to this, I just don't want something like Coverity where it is only run periodically and only a few people even look at it much less fix problems. --joel
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel